<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>ibm to buy sun Archives - Dragonsoft Technology View</title>
	<atom:link href="https://blog.dragonsoft.us/tag/ibm-to-buy-sun/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://blog.dragonsoft.us/tag/ibm-to-buy-sun/</link>
	<description>Talk about Technologies, Software Architecture and Management</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 26 May 2021 03:19:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.3</generator>

 
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2577970</site>	<item>
		<title>IBM to buy SUN &#8211; end of the era?</title>
		<link>https://blog.dragonsoft.us/2009/04/03/ibm-to-buy-sun-end-of-the-era/</link>
					<comments>https://blog.dragonsoft.us/2009/04/03/ibm-to-buy-sun-end-of-the-era/#respond</comments>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Serguei Dosyukov]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:35:24 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Delphi]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ibm to buy sun]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dragonsoft.us/?p=907</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[<p>Updated on 04/07/2009 Talk rumored in 1998 and surfaced once again in 2002 will continue &#8211; IBM was in final talks to acquire Sun&#8230; It was suspected that some news would be announced by Monday 04/06/2009 http://www.betanews.com/article/IBMs-acquisition-of-Sun-Down-to-the-details/1238698365 http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/03/technology/business-computing/03blue.html and they did &#8211; it fell apart&#8230; offer has been rejected http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&#38;sid=aijKk7Ur2M0c&#38;refer=news Will we<a class="moretag" href="https://blog.dragonsoft.us/2009/04/03/ibm-to-buy-sun-end-of-the-era/"> Read more</a></p>
<p>The post <a href="https://blog.dragonsoft.us/2009/04/03/ibm-to-buy-sun-end-of-the-era/">IBM to buy SUN &#8211; end of the era?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blog.dragonsoft.us">Dragonsoft Technology View</a>.</p>
]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Updated on 04/07/2009</em></p>
<p>Talk rumored in 1998 and surfaced once again in 2002 will continue &#8211; IBM was in final talks to acquire Sun&#8230; It was suspected that some news would be announced by Monday 04/06/2009</p>
<p><a href="http://www.betanews.com/article/IBMs-acquisition-of-Sun-Down-to-the-details/1238698365">http://www.betanews.com/article/IBMs-acquisition-of-Sun-Down-to-the-details/1238698365</a><br />
<a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/03/technology/business-computing/03blue.html">http://www.nytimes.com/2009/04/03/technology/business-computing/03blue.html</a></p>
<p>and they did &#8211; it fell apart&#8230; <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/ousiv/idUSTRE5351IV20090406" target="_blank" rel="noopener">offer has been rejected</a></p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aijKk7Ur2M0c&amp;refer=news">http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;sid=aijKk7Ur2M0c&amp;refer=news</a></p>
<p>Will we see negotiation saga continued or would be there another bidder? Or&#8230;</p>
<p>In rumors of Sun&#8217;s CEO could be replaced, so memorable <a href="http://www.reuters.com/article/marketsNews/idINN0641567520090406" target="_blank" rel="noopener">statement was issued</a>: &#8220;As a policy Sun does not comment on rumors or speculation. What we can say is that Sun is committed to its leadership team, growth strategy and building value for its shareholders&#8221;. Yahoo anyone?</p>
<p>It is not doom and gloom for Sun, but it all went against market expectations&#8230; and what is in there for IBM really?</p>
<ul>
<li>Cannot overrun a competitor, buy it</li>
<li>No more patent wars over Java -&gt; IBM JDK to consume final parts of Sun JDK</li>
<li>Java push via existing customer base</li>
<li>Solaris to replace AIX? Is there market left for Solaris? IBM will keep the goodies and Solaris to go away?</li>
<li>NetBeans or Eclipse? Rational or Sun Studio? -&gt; Eclipse+Rational with NetBeans flavor?</li>
<li>+ IBM JavaFX</li>
<li>+ IBM X86 virtualization</li>
</ul>
<p>All good and nice, but remember the Lotus story? Died silently… what would follow? Java? mySQL? New Google DB engine to emerge built by ex Sun employees? Another era of mainframe computers with Java only present on enterprise level?</p>
<p>I am not pro-Java person, but this is the milestone not to miss!</p>
<hr/><span style="font-size: 7pt">Copyright &copy; 2026 <strong><a href="https://blog.dragonsoft.us">Dragonsoft Technology View</a></strong>. This Feed is for personal non-commercial use only.</span><p>The post <a href="https://blog.dragonsoft.us/2009/04/03/ibm-to-buy-sun-end-of-the-era/">IBM to buy SUN &#8211; end of the era?</a> appeared first on <a href="https://blog.dragonsoft.us">Dragonsoft Technology View</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
					<wfw:commentRss>https://blog.dragonsoft.us/2009/04/03/ibm-to-buy-sun-end-of-the-era/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
			<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">907</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 
Lazy Loading (feed)
Minified using Disk
Database Caching 17/77 queries in 0.048 seconds using Disk

Served from: blog.dragonsoft.us @ 2026-10-21 21:38:50 by W3 Total Cache
-->